Abstract Background: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 is a generic instrument to assess disability. Pain and psychological factors seem to play a pronounced disabling role in fibromyalgia (FM). There are few studies that investigate the factors associated with disability in patients with fibromyalgia from the patient's perspective. Information about FM disability using self-reported questionnaires is limited. This study aimed to assess the relationship between the ordinal response variable (degree of disability), and four explanatory variables: pain intensity, depression, anxiety, and alexithymia. Methods: One hundred fifteen women with FM were enrolled in the cross-sectional study. For the assessment of disability the WHODAS 2.0 (36-item version) was used. Univariate and multivariate (ordinal logistic regression) analyses were performed to assess the relationship between pain (Visual Analogue Scale), depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), alexithymia (Modified Toronto Alexithymia Scale) and disability. Results: Disability was detected by global WHODAS score in 114 patients (99%), with the corresponding percentages for mild, moderate and severe disability being 11.3, 46.96 and 40.87%, respectively. Global WHODAS score was more severe among subjects with depression (50 vs 36.4, p < 0.001, effect size = 0.33) and alexithymia (50 vs 33.6, p < 0.001, effect size = 0.38). Pain intensity mean scores for mild, moderate and severe disability were 5.0, 6.1 and 7.3, respectively (p < 0.001, omega-squared = 0.12). Pain intensity explained the global disability degree and its domains except for the cognitive one. Whereas, depression explained cognitive and personal relation domains. On the other hand, alexithymia explained global disability degree and all domains of WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire. Conclusions: Most of the patients with fibromyalgia perceived themselves with moderate to severe disability. The main explanatory variables of the perceived disability were the pain intensity and psychological factors (alexithymia and depression).

Resumen Introducción: A diferencia de otras enfermedades reumáticas, la gota es una enfermedad rara en mujeres en edad fértil. Debido al escaso número de casos disponibles para el estudio, la información actual se basa, principalmente, en reportes de casos. Objetivo: Describir las características y el desarrollo del embarazo en mujeres con gota. Métodos: Una búsqueda sistemática de literatura fue realizada en las bases de datos PubMed, Lilacs, Ebsco y Embase, desde la fecha de inclusión hasta agosto del 2016. Se incluyó a pacientes que cumplieron con la definición de gota según los criterios de la American Rheumatism Association y que tenían la descripción de su seguimiento durante el embarazo. Cada embarazo se trató como una observación independiente para el análisis. A partir de los artículos finalmente seleccionados, se extrajeron los desenlaces materno-fetales. Resultados: La búsqueda identificó 125 artículos potencialmente relevantes, después de la revisión de texto completo, 12 artículos cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Se describen 23 embarazos que resultaron en 16 (69,5%) nacimientos vivos, 5 (21,7%) abortos, una (4,3%) interrupción del embarazo y en un caso (4,3%) no se describió el desenlace. No se reportaron muertes maternas. Dos recién nacidos fallecieron después del parto. No se documentaron malformaciones congénitas. Las complicaciones maternas más frecuentes fueron la insuficiencia renal, la anemia, la preeclampsia y la uremia posparto. Conclusiones: La gota durante el embarazo no es común, pero se sabe que ocurre. Mientras que la mayoría de las mujeres con gota tuvieron bebés sanos, presentaban un mayor riesgo de tener complicaciones maternas.

Abstract Article history: Received 4 January 2017 Accepted 17 October 2017 Available online 24 May 2018 Introduction: Unlike other rheumatic diseases, gout is rare in women of childbearing age. Due to the low number of cases available for the study, current information is based mainly on case reports. Objective: To describe the characteristics and the outcome of the pregnancy of women with gout. Methods: A systematic literature search was undertaken by the investigators in the PubMed and Embase databases, from the inclusion date to August 2016. Patients were included if they met the definition of gout according to the American Rheumatism Association criteria, and that they had the description of its follow-up during the pregnancy. Data collection and analysis: each pregnancy was treated as a separate observation for analysis. The maternal and fetal-neonatal outcomes data were extracted from the articles finally selected. Results: The search identified 125 potentially relevant articles, but after a full-text review only 12 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of the 23 pregnancies described, there were 16 (69.5%) live births, 5 (21.7%) were aborted, in one (4.3%), the pregnancy was terminated, and in one case report (4.3%) there was no description on the term of pregnancy. No maternal deaths were reported. Two babies died a few hours after birth. Congenital malformations were not described in any case report. The most frequent maternal complications were renal damage, anemia, preeclampsia, and postpartum uremia. Conclusions: Gout during pregnancy is not common, but it is known to occur. While the majority of women with gout delivered healthy infants, they were at increased risk of having maternal complications.